If you watch any movie/documentary this year or next, this is the one to watch. It tells the story of a man willing to sacrifice everything for his country. And for that the U.S. government wants him dead. To them he’s the greatest enemy–greater than ISIS and al Qaeda. Whats Edward Snowden’s crime? He is a whistleblower. He exposed the truth of the government’s unconstitutional attack on our rights. Watch the truth while you still can.
Rotten Tomatoes gave the documentary an almost perfect score (as of this writing it scored 98%).
Though superlatives can mischaracterize any movie’s qualities, it is not an overstatement, I think, to call “Citizenfour,” Laura Poitras’ film about Edward Snowden, the movie of the century (to date).
That statement is meant, first off, to suggest certain things about its relation to our collective past, present and future. No film so boldly X-rays certain crucial changes wrought upon the world, and especially America and its government, by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. No film so demands to be seen by every sentient person who values his or her own freedom and privacy. No film so clearly implies actions that need to be taken to prevent the 21st century from turning into an Orwellian nightmare in which technologically-enabled tyranny is absolute and true political liberty, for all intents and purposes, nonexistent.
Eugene Robinson is no right winger. Therefore it will hard for Obama dupes to discredit thoughtful articles likes these. It’s time to realize the occupant in the White House is clueless.
“I don’t oppose all wars,” said Barack Obama, then an Illinois state senator, in 2002. “What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war.”
Few would describe Obama’s use of military force against the Islamic State as rash, given the time he took in deciding to act. But the more we learn about this intervention, the more it appears to violate the “dumb” half of the president’s dictum. The purposes, parameters and prospects of the war are increasingly uncertain. Americans have a right to be concerned about the whole enterprise.
How far will people go to obey authority?
The most powerful example may have come from a real-life con: prank calls that led dozens of managers at fast food joints and grocery stores to interrogate and strip search their own employees.
But the most famous of these occurred in 2004, when a manager at a Kentucky McDonald’s received a phone call from a man claiming to be a police officer. He told the manager that one of her employees was accused of theft. He instructed her to strip search the woman, an 18-year-old high school student. The manager did as instructed.
An Iranian photojournalist was reported to have been detained on Friday, two days after his images of protesters deploring acid attacks on women in the city of Isfahan were published by news organizations around the world.
I bet you didn’t know about this. I why don’t we know about?
If the Democratic Party were really run by people who believed in principles they would choose Elizabeth Warren to run for President. But they are not. Warren is critical of the financial elite in this country. The Democrats are run by that same interest. That is why the establishment is pushing Hillary. Everyone knows Ms.Clinton is a loyal pawn of Wall St. and the corporations. This is another example of why Democrats and Republicans fundamentally the same:
While an increasingly unpopular President Obama seems to be on a self-imposed Rose Garden strategy this election, one Democrat is in demand on the campaign trail: Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
She’s an unabashed progressive from Massachusetts, a Democrat who thinks Democrats are too timid and a populist who has been called to help in red, blue and purple states. And despite her frequent protests, she’s someone that liberals long to see launch a 2016 bid for the White House.
Warren is an unusual Washington phenom—a combination of loyal soldier and inside agitator, a star who has no problem taking on her own party.
A key pro-establishment Hong Kong politician on Friday urged the territory’s chief executive to step down, saying people had lost their trust in the government and a failure to resign would only exacerbate societal divisions.
With democracy protests having paralyzed parts of the city for nearly a month, the call by Liberal Party leader James Tien marked the first time that a pro-Beijing lawmaker has thrown his weight behind calls by the Pan-Democratic camp urging Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying to step aside.
Politically themed YouTube videos could be the next target of federal regulators.
Don’t be fooled. The objective here is destroying dissent under the guise of ensuring adherence to campaign laws.
The explosion and enforcement of restrictive voter ID laws make this one thing very clear